Satanism and Modern Culture

Current Events, World Discussion, Opinions etc
120 posts Page 4 of 5
TERRIBILITA
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:51 pm




venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


TERRIBILITA wrote :
By the way. My name is Benedict Shekinah


Oops, I was wrong. Apologies Wade.
herbsandspices
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:21 pm


So, again, why dont you do your own critique of these things that you call godless rather than regurgitating others.

Writing like an old text doesn't give your words more authority. Thy arguments still faileth.

Also, when you stop listening to others' ideas, and see the world as full of debauched sinners that will all burn in the pit, except for you and a few select others, you're just inches away from being the guy on the street corner wearing a sandwich board with "the end is night- repent" hastily scrawled on it in boot polish.

You're not being devout, just egocentric. Every possible post you turn into a discussion of yourself whenever possible- probably subconsciously. You continue to hammer on about yourself, despite the respounding chorus of "we don't care" responses. Your posts here are not focused on God, but are instead a reflection of a confused and ill defined self-identity. I hope you find something in this life that dosn't involve a sandwich board- but you're going the wrong way about it.

Last time I checked Christ didn't troll the internet, he spent his time helping the needy.
TERRIBILITA
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:51 pm


I'm trying to help free you from the Devil and Hell.
itchytriggerniggerfingers
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:39 pm


TERRIBILITA wrote :
I'm trying to help free you from the Devil and Hell.



Newsflash: We don't need your help. Each one of us is more than capable of deciding our own path in life. But feel free to keep posting. Can we ask Admin to open a new forum section for comedy?
VJ DAMAGE
Posts: 1886
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 6:07 pm


Hea matey, you have been screwing around here for a few years now and are one of the reasons most people don't bother with this forum anymore. So, I have to ask, exactly how many converts have you had? And has taking something that a lot of people used to enjoy and turning it lame in the interests of your wanking been worth it?

Just curious.

please no coloured fonts or videos in your reply.

I dunno if you even do the coloured font thing still

Doesn't matter, I suppose its just a rhetorical question and there will be no sensible reply.

still -I think it sucks wang what has become of this place as a result of a few selfish twats

Meh.
Teejay
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:36 pm


Hey Grand Annalizor, Have you actually read Antons satanic bible? It's pretty interesting in spots. I like the whole enjoy your own life and don't hurt others vibe it has going. Seriously though. Piss off. You ruin this otherwise great website clown shoes.
Marsoups
Posts: 1368
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 3:57 pm


TERRIBILITA wrote :
Marsoups wrote :
... in the eyes of science is of eternal space, cause and effect, evolution, people evolving ideas etc.

Most people are unaware that there is absolutely no scientific evidence for molecule-to-man evolution. Darwin himself produced none and none has been found since despite 140 years of research. The fossil record that he relied upon exclusively for objective proof has yielded the opposite effect of negating his theory. Dawinists acknowledge that biological advancement upward from the primitive to the complex by inheritance over time has never been observed. It is assumed by Darwinists to have occurred in the past aided by unlimited time. Such an assumption moves the concept instantly and completely out of the province of science and into the realm of metaphysical speculation. All evidence given as "proof" of evolution is that which demonstrates, in truth, the opposite; the obvious fact of genetic variability, that is, variation within kinds (VWK) such as the "dog/wolf/jackel/coyote" kind which is rich in its genetic variation and so to with "cat kind" and the "horse kind." In fact tigers have been crossed with lions, horses with zebras, and llamas with camels. God in His marvelous design concept DNA logically included a provision for biological variability and adaptability to changing environments across the spectrum of earthly space and time.
[/quote]

There is some truth in there in my opinion - the variability and adaptability. Variation and random evolving of new features is quite necessary in order for us to be where we are today. If you ask a random scientist whether there is scientific evidence for molecule-to-man evolution, I will assure you that 95% of them would agree that there is solid evidence for this, almost to an extent that they will be inclined to believe that there is very little doubt. All animals and life can be proven with their genetic coding to stem from a common ancestor. Ours is very similar to apes, apes similar to primates, monkeys, shrews and exhibit the same feature of the order 'mamallian'. 'insects' are far different to humans yet exhibit trends that form in line with a common stem from which their features evolved / adapted over time. On a microscale, evolution is apperent in humans as well, eg. people with darker skins living in temperate zones, people with lighter skins coming from colder climates. All this bears proof that life is always changing, evolving, and will never be the same.

These facts, of course, point to common ancestry. They point to ancestor kinds, the created kinds or baramins, that had sufficient genetic information to produce these more specific breeds and species none of which in nature can go back to the original. They no longer have that wider information in their DNA. They have gone genetically downhill. In 4000 years of recorded history, given the billions upon billions of births across the entire spectrum of life forms from ants to elephants, not one advancement upward, as required by evolution, has been observed. Not one! On the other hand, since the dawn of history, ithas been observed that species of living things do vary in phenotype around a basic norm. And it has also been known, since the dawn of history, that their are absolute limitations to the range of these polymorphic variations; e.g, dogs remain dogs, horses remain horses, llamas, camels, lions, tigers all remain fixed within their basic kind since mutations cannot by the known laws of genetics add new information to their DNA complex.


I'm not sure what is meant by 'one advancement upward', as they turned into what they did from upward advancing. Any 'downward' advancement would mean that species cease to exist. Upward advancement = survive, downward advancement = extinction.

Dogs will remain dogs and so forth over time due to the genetic variability and the fact that there are so many of them. Humans too are unlikely to evolve much due to the size of the human population and the ability to easily move from one place to the next without separations for hundreds of thousands of generations.
In fact evolutionists no longer attempt to explain their theory which they have relabeled "macro-evolution" or "mega-transformation" (meaning of course, biological progression upward in complexity from primeval slime to man by inheritance over time). The reason is that such upward transformations of life forms and the development of separate and individual organs of life forms by undirected "natural" processes cannot even be imagined much less demonstrated scientifically so they resort to vague speculations which are then labeled as science. Massive propaghanda is then employed to ensure approval of such labeling by poular vote of the full spectrum of secular philosopher-scientists. Researchers in evolution spin their wheels studying and proving over and over again the phenomenon of variation within existing species or kinds which creationists had established scientifically with Linnaeus 260 years ago. This poitless research is then presented to textbook publishers, the press and the media with the full intention that it should be taken variously as evidence of real evolution, that is to say, molecule-to-man evolution. Which is nothing but another Satanic plot and strategy against Christianity of creating false theories and ideologies disseminated through the organizations of Judeo-Freemasonry, to lead mankind to reject their God, His Word, Redemption and His Church, and instead fall into Atheism and Paganism on the Luciferean way of destruction.


Okay,this is where that theory is getting much less scientific and far more into speculation than the theories of evolution itself and into much conjecture, ignoring the voice of science.. Basically this is calling science 'luciferean', and this has no other proof other than the words from a few living mortals, and when questioned not every priest is in agreement and accepts their word as the word. Not very good proof when you look at in sensibly.

As noted above, God in His magnificent design concept for life, which we have come to know as DNA, implanted "natural selective" properties known as "alleles" and other mechanisms, such as mobile and repetitive elements. These provide the potential for genetic variations with each of His created kinds. This provision of variation within kind is recognized as a great conservation mechanism, enabling species to adjust to environmental changes rather than become extinct. In fact recent studies have shown that adjustments by living organisns to environmental changes can occur so rapidly they cannot be fully explained by multiple life and death cycles of the selection process as required by evolution (Spetner, Not by Chance, 1997, pp. 200-201)

This is in contrast to the earlier mention of things 'evolving downwards'.
Thus, while the phenomenon of Variation Within Kind (VWK) by selective processes is well demonstrated, no advancement to higher more complex life forms have ever been observed in practice and cannot be in theory since the known laws of thermodynamics and information science preclude the possibility. Bacteria that became immune to antibiotics due to mutations (copying mistakes) have not adavanced upward in complexity to a new "higher" life form, they remain bacteria. In fact, as with all mutant strains, they have, like the domestic breeds noted above, lost genetic information and have "gone downhill" with degraded DNA.


Far wrong, see my second paragraph.

The Wister Symposium: Professional Darwinists (agents of the Illuminati) have purposely concealed this truth. They have tacitly conceded among themselves the virtual impossibility of abiogenesis (the spontaneous origin of life), but are determined to exclude God as Creator. As long ago as 1967 at the Wister Symposium it was conceded by evolutionists that the "mechanism" of mutation could not produce the raw material for a fish-to-man evolution scenario. Fifty-two of the world's leading biologists, mathemeticians and philosophers of evolution convened to consider some of the major obstacles confronting their theory. The "problems" were primarily those introduced by the second law of thermodynamics and the principles of information science. These law demonstrate that mutations, which are errors in replication, can only delete information from gene pools.

The Chicago Conference in 1980, thirteen years following the Wister Symposium, another historic conference was convened in the hope of resolving the other major problems for macr-evolution, namely, the failure of the fossil record to produce evidence for the theory. This time 160 of the world's most prominent naturalists discussed and debated the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis, a major theory made necessary by the lack of evidence in the fossils. The results of the Chicago meeting were so bad for the naturalists' agenda that very little has been recorded in the media since the initial reports. The 160 delegates left the conference frustrated and confused; torn by conflicting loyalties between the "old school" of slow and gradual evolution versus the new school of "evolution without evidence." However, as we have learned to expect, they departed, steadfast philosophers of Dawinism to the last one.

Stunned by the disastrous effect of these two meetings, the Illuminati's agents instituted a new strategy; that of altering the public's perception of "evolution" to mean "any form of biological change." Accordingly, to divert attention from the bankruptcy of naturalistic origins theory the agents of evolutionism conditioned the secular world to believe falsely that the phenomenon of variation within kinds (VWK) is evidence of real (molecule-to-man) evolution. This deliberate misinformation constitutes one of the greatest ideological deceptions of modern times. The powers that control the sources of public education and information (e.g, the media, newspapers, magazines, scientific and technical journals, text book publishers, public schools, etc.) have, over the last 30 years, cunningly instituted this redefinition into popular culture. Thus the universally recognized phenomenon of variation within kind, the virtual antithesis of evolution, is given to the world deceitfully as "proof" of "naturalism." The propagandists behind Darwinism know. that the VWK phenomenon has nothing to do with the notion of biological transformation upward in complexity from lifeless matter.

How is it then that so many of the world's leading scientists and academicians have succumbed to this obvious subterfuge? Again, in more pungent language we ask how so many presumably abled scientists and professors not connected directly to Masonic cults could be so intellectually and spiritually dense?

Extract from an article by A. N. Arthur and Theo H. Tirips


There is no proof for what you have written, other than absolute conjecture.
TERRIBILITA
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:51 pm


Marsoups wrote :
There is no proof for what you have written, other than absolute conjecture.

In the beginning God created heaven, and earth.... And He said: Let Us [GOD the Blessed Trinity] make man to Our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth. And God created man to His own image: to the image of God He created him: male and female He created them. And God blessed them... And God saw all the things that He had made, and they were very good. (Gen. 1:1, 26-28, 31)
rollyz
Posts: 3334
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 6:58 pm


What is a blessing? What does a blessing do? Is it some magical power? Do you get all warm fuzzy feeling inside? Can it stop the common cold?
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


..
Last edited by venatrix on Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


..
Last edited by venatrix on Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


Just the videos then eh? That's a shame.
MotherShabubu
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:27 am


venatrix wrote :
Just the videos then eh? That's a shame.

C'mon, you mean you think papers by erudite professionals with years of experience in academia and the respect of their peers are better than youtube videos by people with a meagre command of the English language, a camcorder and an internet connection?
Obviously the NWO'ers are winning. My faith in humanity has been damaged by this thread.
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


MotherShabubu wrote :
C'mon, you mean you think papers by erudite professionals with years of experience in academia and the respect of their peers are better than youtube videos by people with a meagre command of the English language, a camcorder and an internet connection?
Obviously the NWO'ers are winning. My faith in humanity has been damaged by this thread.


They're winning indeed. I've seen your noble efforts on facebook to try and reason with people. I've seen the garbage which is being posted and reposted and I admire your patience and diligence in responding the way you do.

I was having a conversation today about the new exhibition that has just opened, and how it is coincidental bordering on spooky how every exhibition, no matter how old, obscure, or specialised the content is, practically mirrors current affairs and events both in Australia and internationally. What is spooky is not the seeming coincidences (if anyone calles them synchronicities I will die a little inside), but that we as humans repeat the same social and cultural actions and reactions time after time after time. Governments and rulers have gone down the same path for thousands of years. The same responses get the same results. What keeps luring us down this same path? I think if I knew I might give up all hope.
FeralBrown
Posts: 5944
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:26 pm


^Simple.
$s.

No rocket-surgery involved!
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


..
Last edited by venatrix on Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
fnarky
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm


There's too much else happening in my "real" world to delve into this thread in much detail now, but I thought it may be worth recounting something I saw yesterday...

Natascha and I were walking along the Ghats in Varanasi when we happened upon a decaying human skull that had been placed very deliberately in the middle of the walkway.

It had been placed there by the Aghora, an occult Hindu sect whose devotees amass great power through the practice of tantra and other rituals, including cannibalism. Or so I am told by the locals here in Varanasi.

If you're not familiar with the Aghora sect, I guess Google should be able to provide a starting point. One thing I would stress is that I understand the Aghora have a very strict ethical code. It may not overlap with your own, but I find it reassuring that they use their powers with great care and intention.

Full beam love to Oz!!
Mark~
fnarky
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm


FeralBrown wrote :
^Simple.
$s.

No rocket-surgery involved!


What channel are you on, FB?
fnarky
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm


Oh, and one thing Venatrix - about that word, "synchronicity"... yes it's very much maligned. Artists whoise work mirrors current events, well thatr's metaphor - even if it's unintended. Like, Tolkein claimed that despite writing the Lord of the Rings during WWII, it was in no way metaphorical. Well perhaps! But it's hard to imagine that world events had no bearning on his psyche at the time of writing.

Anyway, back to synchronicity... people also misuse the word because they're afraid to use the word telepathy. Like, a couple of weeks ago my sister, who is on the other side of the world, baked cinamon scrolls for the first time. At the very same moment as she was baking, I was eating a cinamon scroll, probably for the first time in about five years.

Now I admit that's a lame example of telepathy. One could easily brush it off as coincidence, and an atheist such as yourself might be extra keen to do so. But there is more to our minds and souls than you may fathom, and you may one day realise that absolute lack of faith blinds a person to their own potential and many other things besides.

If we were living in the 1970s I would have been right there with you. The most advanced thinking on the subject was Edward Hall's "The Silent Language". And as true and important as that book may have been, we have come a long way since then. And I don't mean t'intenernets.

:atom:
FeralBrown
Posts: 5944
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:26 pm


fnarky wrote :
FeralBrown wrote :
^Simple.
$s.

No rocket-surgery involved!


What channel are you on, FB?


They jammed Channel 23, so it's all smoke-signals and stuff from here on in. :?
fnarky
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm


Bugger. They do like to intrude, don't they...
venatrix
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:43 pm


fnarky wrote :
Oh, and one thing Venatrix - about that word, "synchronicity"... yes it's very much maligned. Artists whoise work mirrors current events, well thatr's metaphor - even if it's unintended. Like, Tolkein claimed that despite writing the Lord of the Rings during WWII, it was in no way metaphorical. Well perhaps! But it's hard to imagine that world events had no bearning on his psyche at the time of writing.

Anyway, back to synchronicity... people also misuse the word because they're afraid to use the word telepathy. Like, a couple of weeks ago my sister, who is on the other side of the world, baked cinamon scrolls for the first time. At the very same moment as she was baking, I was eating a cinamon scroll, probably for the first time in about five years.

Now I admit that's a lame example of telepathy. One could easily brush it off as coincidence, and an atheist such as yourself might be extra keen to do so. But there is more to our minds and souls than you may fathom, and you may one day realise that absolute lack of faith blinds a person to their own potential and many other things besides.

If we were living in the 1970s I would have been right there with you. The most advanced thinking on the subject was Edward Hall's "The Silent Language". And as true and important as that book may have been, we have come a long way since then. And I don't mean t'intenernets.

:atom:


Do you attribute a deeper meaning or spiritual significance to the cinnamon scroll event?
fnarky
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm


Ha ha ha, Oh too funny, the simple things... But yes, I do.

My experience of the "astral" is very much embryonic but yeah, I'd say my sister and I were communicating on a level beyond conscious thought.

This is my second six-month trip to India. Last time the "synchronicities" literally drove me mad. I simply couldn't believe that things would pan out in such a karmic way without some human manipulator pulling strings. It took me six months to recover my sanity. For real.

Events this time have been no less shocking, but whereas last time I was skeptical, this time I have faith. And that has made all the difference. (Amazingly, it was Barnaby Joice who taught me the meaning of faith. His sermon was pretty obvious realy, but I'd never actually stopped to think about it... http://www.upyourthumb.com/2010/12/stuck-in-saint-george-with-barnaby.html)

BTW, the cinnamon scroll event was pretty minor compared to the ghost that tried to drown me in the lake at Pokhera. Now that was freaky!! ;o)
MotherShabubu
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:27 am


fnarky wrote :
Anyway, back to synchronicity... people also misuse the word because they're afraid to use the word telepathy. Like, a couple of weeks ago my sister, who is on the other side of the world, baked cinamon scrolls for the first time. At the very same moment as she was baking, I was eating a cinamon scroll, probably for the first time in about five years.

Now I admit that's a lame example of telepathy. One could easily brush it off as coincidence, and an atheist such as yourself might be extra keen to do so. But there is more to our minds and souls than you may fathom, and you may one day realise that absolute lack of faith blinds a person to their own potential and many other things besides.

I've got a similar anecdote about synchronicites (or coincedences as those nihilists deluded by science like to call them). Today I woke up at 14:20:36.286.713, i mean the chances of me waking up at that exact mircosecond in the day are like 86 million to 1 (it'd be even more unlikely if my atomic clock was more accurate).

Tim Minchin wrote :
To presume that your one-in-64-million chance thing is a miracle is to significantly underestimate the total number of... things... that there are
120 posts Page 4 of 5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests